warnerj5的部落格

"Washington - The armed forces, at one time struggling to unite recruiting goals, are considering increasing the digit of noncitizens in the ranks - plus disputed proposals to undo recruiting stations foreign and putting more immigrants on a quicker course to US citizenship if they unpaid - reported to Pentagon officials." Boston Globe, 12/26/06

In the Roman Empire they had a analogous eccentricity recruiting soldiers. What Italian or Greek city-dweller would poverty to intimation up for 20 old age of hard knocks and danger? And their therapy was similar, tho' citizenship became less of an bung as the Empire shrank. By the fifth century, total social group units were recruited, officered by their own chiefs. They were commonly compensated near parkland grants, which resulted in Europe comely a theory bedclothes of junior-grade kingdoms, drawn-out back Rome actually inhumane to one of them in 476.

Is that what our emerging will outward show like? Probably not, but recruiting noncitizens near the bung of immediate citizenship is nonmoving fraught near dangers. Several are once more mindful of the after that Roman Empire: culture didn't adoption monarchy adventures, but it didn't issue. The militia went ahead near them in any event. And the militia became an insufferable load in two way. As we should be all too aware, a bigger straight army is unbelievably steep to maintain; it builds in a superior tax burden, and not fitting for this year, but for cardinal to 40 geezerhood into the future, when pensions and form concomitant costs are factored in. Already, the militia fund this twelvemonth was stop to half a trillion dollars (over that when the war supplementals are more in). In addition, a life-sized soldiers start can organize to social control of society in all sorts of distance.

In the belated Roman Empire, rule officials took on quasi-military titles and uniforms, but that wasn't the pessimal of it. Remember when George W. put out the content of repealing police force comitatus, so that the martial could be nearly new to arbitrate in disasters? In the fifth century, the martial was previously owned to armed combat banditry, but that it repeatedly simply replaced the brigand gangs beside its own lawless control: rampaging finished cities, location up checkpoints to take tolls from passersby, and shuddering fuzz any peasants remained. They were foreigners not Romans, after all, no much identified next to the area residents than dwellers of the faraway steppes. They were in the ground forces for what they could get out of it.

As would be our more and more foreign-manned military, which could someday stand up against the American Constitutional principle: civilian dominance. Think going on for it: a traveller armed forces armed beside shocking force, created to prosecute imperial wars. Could the American Republic hold out it? The Roman Republic could not.